A Summary of What Some Top Doctors/Scientists Are Saying About the Risks of the COVID Shot

I am not a medical doctor. Nevertheless, I thought it might be useful (if only for myself) to summarize what I understand some top-notch scientists are saying about the risks of the COVID injection. I provide links to interviews with these doctors so that you can listen to the details and assess for yourself. If you have not yet listened, you owe it to yourself and your loved ones to watch these videos before taking the COVID injection. It takes time to try to understand…there is no way around it. Instead of watching a movie I often read in the evening. I often get up early and and post information before my workday begins. I try to contribute in ways I can because I believe we are at a critical point in history. We each can make a contribution, but it requires being as informed as we can be. The pressure to take the shot will only grow in the coming months despite the availability of safe, inexpensive, and effective therapeutics such as ivermectin.

Professor Sucharit Bhakdi MD, Professor Emeritus of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Former Chair, Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz (Medical Doctor and Scientist) (Germany and Thailand) See video here or search the Lighthouse Economic website for several longer interviews.

Dr Wolfgang Wodarg, Specialist in Pulmonary and Bronchial Internal Medicine, Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology, and Public Health; Honorary Member of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe and former Head of the Health Committee of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe; former Member of Parliament, German Bundestag; Initiator and Spokesman for the study commission ‘Ethics and Law in Modern Medicine’; Author and University Lecturer (Medical Doctor) (Germany) See video here.

Dr Michael Yeadon BSc (Joint Honours in Biochemistry and Toxicology) PhD (Pharmacology), Formerly Vice President & Chief Scientific Officer Allergy & Respiratory, Pfizer Global R&D; Co-founder & CEO, Ziarco Pharma Ltd.; Independent Consultant (Scientist) (United Kingdom) See video here.

Summary: Dr. Bhakdi, Wodarg, and Yeadon (and others) are concerned about: 1) blood clotting and bleeding disorders including stroke; 2) severe allergic reactions to injections that contain polyethylene glycol; 3) potential infertility; 4) create dangerous auto-immune responses that increase with every successive injection. The problems can lead to severe health problems and death. These otherwise mild-mannered serious scientists are using language like “decimate the world population” (Bhakdi) or “depopulation” (Yeadon), long-term chronic illnesses such as auto-immune diseases such multiple sclerosis, rheumatism, and immune system malfunctions that could occur in the nervous system or in the joints, etc. (Wodarg).

Dr Geert Vanden Bossche, Ph.D in Virology from the University of Hohenheim, Germany. He held adjunct faculty appointments at universities in Belgium and Germany. After his career in Academia, Geert joined several vaccine companies (GSK Biologicals, Novartis Vaccines, Solvay Biologicals) to serve various roles in vaccine R&D as well as in late vaccine development. Geert then moved on to join the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s Global Health Discovery team in Seattle (USA) as Senior Program Officer; he then worked with the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) in Geneva as Senior Ebola Program Manager. At GAVI he tracked efforts to develop an Ebola vaccine. He also represented GAVI in fora with other partners, including WHO, to review progress on the fight against Ebola. See video here.

Summary: Until now I had not posted any of the Bossche interviews because I didn’t understand what he was saying. The link I provided above provides an excellent interview where he describes his concerns about the COVID gene therapies. First, though Bossche acknowledges the concerns highlighted by Bhakdi, Wordarg, Yeadon, and others, he contends that this new type of gene therapy “vaccine” holds promise to be an effective medical treatment. He is generally pro-mRNA vaccine technology. For reasons, outlined by Bhakdi, Wordarg, and Yeadon, as well as other reasons I describe here, I do not agree with him on this assessment. However, what he says is absolutely terrifying…if he is correct. He says that the mRNA “vaccine” is the wrong tool being used at absolutely the wrong time and as a result the risk is GLOBAL–the entire human population is at risk: 1) for those who have been injected, the gene therapeutic instructions override one’s natural or innate immune response. When a person is exposed a variant of the coronavirus, the pathogen-specific immunity offered by the therapy out competes one’s natural immunity response, but it is not the “right tool” the body needs to combat the variant coronavirus. The therapeutic immunity is too specific and thus, the “vaccinated” person is in danger of being overwhelmed by the variant virus; 2) when the gene therapeutic “vaccine” is used in the midst of an outbreak, we are effectively breeding even more infectious variants. We are training the virus to be more dangerous, not less. He states: “Mass infection prevention and mass vaccination with leaky Covid-19 vaccines in the midst of the pandemic can only breed highly infectious variants. In this interview he carefully makes his case, at one point nearly coming to tears at what he sees coming down the pike for us all. What he is saying is far scarier than what Bhakdi, Wordarg, and Yeadon are warning about. You can access written materials by Bossche here. His choice to speak out has transformed his career into a dumpster fire. If he is right, both the vaccinated and unvaccinated, all of us, are in serious trouble.

Dr. Shane Crotty obtained his Ph.D. from the University California, San Fransisco. He joined La Jolla Institute for Immunology in 2003, as well as the department of medicine of University of California, San Diego, in 2004. He is now a full professor with tenure.

Summary: In contrast to these serious warnings, you can listen Professor Shane Crotty of the La Jolla Institute in this interview where he says that the new mRNA are both safe and effective. He indicates that the new mRNA vaccines instruct human cells to produce viral proteins and thus induce the body to protect against the coronavirus. He says that this new type of vaccine is very safe in the short-term and long-term, though I don’t see the basis for saying it is safe in the long-term if only because there hasn’t been enough time to assess long-term safety. He is one of many scientists who hold this view.

How could it be that we have eminent scientists offering such contrasting assessments? Why do people like Dr. Crotty have full media access/exposure, whereas people like Bhakdi, Wodarg, Yeadon, and Bossche are not given a voice in the media and are in fact suppressed? We need a public debate between representatives from each camp.

Published by markskidmore

Mark Skidmore is Professor of Economics at Michigan State University where he holds the Morris Chair in State and Local Government Finance and Policy. His research focuses on topics in public finance, regional economics, and the economics of natural disasters. Mark created the Lighthouse Economics website and blog to share economic research and information relevant for navigating tumultuous times.

2 thoughts on “A Summary of What Some Top Doctors/Scientists Are Saying About the Risks of the COVID Shot

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: