Is MIT’s vaccine safety study too risky for peer review?

Via Maryanne Demasi, Ph.D.: “MIT researchers found a potential safety signal in V-SAFE. A leading vaccine journal rejected the study without peer review—despite having published reassuring findings from the same CDC database. MIT professor Retsef Levi has publicly accused scientific journals of censoring research into vaccine injuries, after his latest Covid vaccine safety study was rejected by both a leading medical journal and a preprint server.”

“We must counter the immense censorship by scientific journals on any discussion of vaccine injuries!” Levi posted on X.

https://open.substack.com/pub/maryannedemasi/p/exclusive-is-mits-vaccine-safety?r=o1vob&utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web

Published by markskidmore

Mark Skidmore is Professor of Economics at Michigan State University where he holds the Morris Chair in State and Local Government Finance and Policy. His research focuses on topics in public finance, regional economics, and the economics of natural disasters. Mark created the Lighthouse Economics website and blog to share economic research and information relevant for navigating tumultuous times.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Lighthouse Economics

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading