FDA Settles Ivermectin Case, Agrees to Remove Controversial ‘Stop It’ Post

“Doctors score win, forcing FDA to remove statements about ivermectin.”

FDA Settles Ivermectin Case, Agrees to Remove Controversial ‘Stop It’ Post | The Epoch Times (possibly behind paywall)

Published by markskidmore

Mark Skidmore is Professor of Economics at Michigan State University where he holds the Morris Chair in State and Local Government Finance and Policy. His research focuses on topics in public finance, regional economics, and the economics of natural disasters. Mark created the Lighthouse Economics website and blog to share economic research and information relevant for navigating tumultuous times.

One thought on “FDA Settles Ivermectin Case, Agrees to Remove Controversial ‘Stop It’ Post

  1. re: the FDA’s official statement: “…“FDA has not changed its position that currently available clinical trial data do not demonstrate that ivermectin is effective against COVID-19. The agency has not authorized or approved ivermectin for use in preventing or treating COVID-19.”…” According to Christine Massey, who so far has collected over 200 FOIA responses showing that nobody yet has isolated COVID-19 in the first place, it is technically accurate to say that ‘nobody has demonstrated that ivermectin is effective against COVID-19’. Ivermectin might not be effective against unicorns, either. We won’t know until someone locates a unicorn. Ivermectin does, however, seem to be effective against radiation poisoning, which is probably what (uninjected) ppl who actually got sick were suffering from.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Lighthouse Economics

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading