Does unacceptably high cross reactivity in PCR testing mean there was no pandemic?

“We conclude that, as the argument there was a genuine pandemic caused by the novel SARS-CoV-2 viral pathogen has largely relied on data from highly inaccurate and unreliable PCR testing, this line of argument is no longer tenable…Without PCR testing data, published official statistics about infection, hospitalisation, and death rates would not be attributable to the novel virus. This, and many of our other analyses have confirmed this attribution is largely false and there must therefore be other explanations for the ‘pandemic’. Such explanations need not include the conclusion there was ‘no virus’.”

https://open.substack.com/pub/wherearethenumbers/p/does-unacceptably-high-cross-reactivity?r=o1vob&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Published by markskidmore

Mark Skidmore is Professor of Economics at Michigan State University where he holds the Morris Chair in State and Local Government Finance and Policy. His research focuses on topics in public finance, regional economics, and the economics of natural disasters. Mark created the Lighthouse Economics website and blog to share economic research and information relevant for navigating tumultuous times.

One thought on “Does unacceptably high cross reactivity in PCR testing mean there was no pandemic?”

  1. There was no pandemic or worldwide excess deaths in 2020 from anything other than protocols and mandates. Look at Jessica Hocketts (substack) excellent work showing that only a few selected cities, particularly New york city and Italy, had a very short wave of deaths. See her causes there.
    Biologist J.J.Couey has demonstrated that prior existing background corona virus parts which were never assessed before 2020 could easily account for the PCR false tests making it appear like a wave of spreading virus was going around when the death and hospitalizations do not confirm such.
    (He also has shown that clones which are used in all corona virus research could have been released in NyC although this method is not necessarily the only method possible. That is why No Virus is not excluded.The No Virus people serve to distract from the fact that there was no pandemic.)
    Finally, as Hockett has shown, the data have not been released for NyC by any outfit despite numerous FOIAs. This article omits the fact that key city which was ground zero will not release its facts, death certificates, and other key facts and, therefore, misleads one to think that all has been released.
    This is the crux of the false pandemic: To have the idea that there was a deadly pandemic. That bioweapons can be created in labs in someones garage that will cause a deadly pandemic (which RNA viruses cannot do with replication since they dont reproduce faithfully. (Again, see Coueys video lectures showing such.)
    That It will happen again. And that we need to prepare and accept the universal loss of law and rights.
    (If one is not aware of Hockett and Coueys work, they and their children will be enslaved by a false scenario and by those who are using it for such.)

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Lighthouse Economics

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading