New Rasmussen Survey: Millions Experienced COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects

“More than a third of Americans who were vaccinated against COVID-19 say they had side effects from the shot, and nearly half suspect the vaccines killed many patients. Twenty-six percent say they had minor side effects and 10% reported major side effects from the vaccine. Based on a U.S. adult population of 258 million, this would mean 63 million had at least some side effects from the COVID-19 vaccine, including more than 17 million who experienced major side effects.”

Millions Experienced COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects – Rasmussen Reports®

Plague of Corruption – Liam Neeson Narrates the Investigation – 80 Years of Deception

THE VIDEO WAS AVAILABLE ON A TEMPORARY BASIS AND THEN PULLED BACK. I WILL SHARE AGAIN ONCE IT IS AGAIN ACCESSIBLE.

Academy Award nominee Liam Neeson narrates this powerful investigation into how the pharmaceutical giants systematically captured governments and deceived families worldwide. Featuring whistleblower authors and attorneys Kent Heckenlively and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., this documentary spans 80 years of deception and betrayal.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kWxQ89BDIo0&pp=0gcJCR4Bo7VqN5tD

It’s Official: Gold Is Once Again the Largest Official Financial Reserve, Surpassing US$ Treasuries for the First Time in Decades

Solari Hero of the Week: Senator Rand Paul and Twila Brase

“In September, U.S. Senator Rand Paul (R-KY), Chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, courageously introduced a bill to repeal Title II of the REAL ID Act of 2005 and its “federal mandate requiring every state to share citizens’ personal data and redesign driver’s licenses to meet federal standards.” Showing that he understands what is fundamentally at stake with the REAL ID, Senator Paul’s bill is titled the Safeguarding Personal Information Act of 2025.”

https://solari.com/hero-of-the-week-november-10-2025-senator-rand-paul-and-twila-brase

2.9 Million-Person Study Finds mRNA Shots Increase Risk of Death, Kidney Failure (Dialysis), and Kidney Injury

“A major new study published in the International Journal of Medical Sciences of 2.9 million adults — 1.45 million vaccinated vs. 1.45 million unvaccinated — has revealed alarming post-vaccination outcomes. This large-scale, real-world analysis drew from the health records of more than 100 million U.S. patients (TriNetX) to evaluate post-vaccine kidney and mortality outcomes over a full year of follow-up, adjusting for age, sex, race, comorbidities, and medication use through one-to-one propensity matching.

The findings are deeply concerning: acute kidney injury and dialysis rates were significantly higher in vaccinated individuals and continued to rise month after month with no indication of slowing. Dialysis — the mechanical filtering of blood used only when the kidneys can no longer function adequately — represents the most severe form of renal failure and underscores the gravity of the observed effect.

Most strikingly, Pfizer (BioNTech) recipients showed an elevated risk of death compared to unvaccinated controls — even after all early post-vaccination deaths were excluded from analysis.

Here’s why these mortality numbers are likely far higher in reality: The authors excluded anyone who died within three months after vaccination to “standardize baseline health.” This maneuver erases the exact period when many fatal serious adverse events occur — myocarditis, embolism, cardiac arrest, or early multi-organ failure. Thus, early vaccine deaths vanish from the data, leaving only survivors. The model then produces an illusory mortality reduction (HR 0.88).”

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-29-million-person-study?r=o1vob&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false

How to Bias a Study on COVID-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnancy

James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D.:

JAMA provides an expert example. They nearly got away with it. But then we read it.

Let me walk you through a masterclass in how to bias a study so thoroughly that even a real risk can disappear. Not with fraud, not with data tampering—just good old-fashioned design flaws, all pointing in one direction. (I will leave it to the reader to decide on this). We’re going to talk about a study recently published in JAMA Network Open by Bernard et al. (2025), which claims that getting an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine during the first trimester of pregnancy isn’t associated with birth defects.

You might have heard this result and thought, “Well, that’s reassuring.”

Let me show you why it’s not.

The Setup: A Live-Birth Only Study

“The researchers looked at over 527,000 live-born infants in France, comparing those whose mothers got an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in the first trimester with those who didn’t. They then looked at the rate of major congenital malformations (MCMs) and said: ‘No difference.’ Their conclusion? The vaccine isn’t teratogenic. It doesn’t cause birth defects.

Here’s the problem: They only looked at live births. That means any fetus with a severe enough defect to lead to termination or fetal death is simply not counted. And guess what? The most severe defects—the ones most likely to show up if a vaccine did have a harmful effect—are the ones most likely to lead to termination or stillbirth. Let me repeat that: They deleted the most relevant cases before the analysis even started.

We don’t need to guess how big the omission is.”

Click below to read the important details. Very important illustration of scientific bias devised to deceive.

https://open.substack.com/pub/popularrationalism/p/how-to-bias-a-study-on-covid-19-vaccine?r=o1vob&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false

Weaponization of Science Round Table: Flaws and Fraud in Research

Presented by MAHA Institute

“While Secretary Kennedy, President Trump, and our new generation of public health officials are bringing a new culture of radical transparency to our top scientific agencies, medical journals, whose job it is to bring us truthful information, continue to operate in an environment of corporate and ideological influence that prohibits the accurate reporting of facts. ‍Join our Round Table and find out how the medical journal ecosystem became a swamp of corruption and how new patterns of information delivery can help revitalize and revolutionize trust in science. Panelists include: Paul Thacker, Brian Hooker, Jason Locasale, Chris Masterjohn, Mark Skidmore Maryanne Demasi, and James Lyons-Weiler.”

October 21, 2025 from 12 – 5 PM EST

If you are in the DC area, please join. A recording of the event will be available afterward. You can register for the event here: https://www.mahainstitute.us/science